Technorati Profile

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Will Richardson on the book How by Dov Seidman

"The strain that much of our culture seems to be under from these shifts is because of how dramatic and how fast they are coming at us.

For centuries, local proximity determined the majority of our social functions, containing us in relatively homogenous environments. We dealt on a day-to-day basis with people with whom we generally shared a common culture and therefore understood easily the behaviors and signals that occurred in the spaces between us. Global connectivity sets that whole idea on its ear. We now find ourselves in a world where we are thrust together in all aspects of our lives without borders and without the homogenizing pressures of locality…Before all information became zeros and ones, our lives moved at a slower pace. We had more time to get to know each other and the luxury to value personal contact in nearly all of our dealings. Now, multinational companies commonly form teams of employers chosen from various divisions, various countries, and various cultures (28).
Distance no longer separates us, and that in itself is a huge shift for most educators to get their brains around. And not only that, but the

…ties that bind us are looser than ever, and there is a new us whose members change almost daily…Electronic communication is both a boon and a bane. It makes these new, powerful networks of collaboration possible, but it does so in a strange and fractured language (31).
One other key point out of many that I could mention here is the effect of all this transparency; basically, your past is your present. And that presents an important challenge: “As reputation becomes more perishable, its value increases. As it becomes more accessible, it becomes a greater asset–and liability (38).”

And so this informs our work of re-envision of what schooling means. As much as we may not like it, we can’t go back.

We will never become less connected. We will never become less transparent…With all these changes to the way we live, connect and conduct our professional and personal lives, the questions become: How do we now thrive? How can we turn these challenges into strengths (39)?
And, I would add for our purposes, how do we prepare our kids to thrive? And as an educational system, how can we be proactive instead of reactive?

So, it’s no longer what you do so much as how you do it.

Success now requires new skills and habits, a new lens for seeing and a new consciousness for relating. In our see-through world, there’s an overabundance of information and it flows too easily for anyone to control it and outfox everyone. You can no longer game the system and expect no one to find out. You need to stop dancing around people and start leading a dance that everyone can follow. Long-term, sustained success is directly proportional to your ability–as a company and as an individual–to make Waves throughout evanescing networks of association, to reach out to others and enlist them in endeavors larger than yourself, and to do so while everyone watches you (55).
So, are we teaching that?

Like I said, most of this is aimed at business, but it’s still an interesting take on what the ramifications of all of this are, for our kids and for ourselves."

Oustanding reflections! How interesting is this? Well done Will and Dov.

Monday, May 28, 2007

Web 2.0 in education

There are two methods of using the Internet in education today. Most schools are using Web 1.0. However some progressive schools are now exploring and using Web 2.0. It's fascinating to observe this evolutionary process unfold.

What is the difference between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 technology?

Web 1.0 is defined as using the computer to RECEIVE INFORMATION. Its emphasis is on COLLECTING and READING information. The computer is used for research using the Internet, writing papers, and presentations. Web 1.0 fails to harness the full power and potential of computers as well as the Internet.

Web 2.0 is using the Internet to facilitate collaboration and sharing between computer users. It uses the Internet as a common platform and the computer for COMMUNICATING with one another. It advocates using blogs, wikis, podcasts, video streaming, social bookmarking and RSS feeds to collaborate. Schools are just beginning to understand its potential. Web 2.0 takes full advantage of the computer technology available. This is the very beginning of a new era in history. This is the next generation of the Internet.

Web 2.0 uses the computer to SEND content, generate and distribute data and PUBLISH information. It emphasizes WRITING, COMMENTING and COLLABORATING. This is all about CONVERSATIONS rather than lectures. Web 2.0 is all about SOCIAL NETWORKING and building collaborative learning communities or teams. It allows students the opportunity to add to the body of knowledge in our world by publishing content. It allows regular individuals to have a GLOBAL VOICE!

Web 2.0 encourages COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE. Collective intelligence concerns how well people work together in a group. Typically this uses the Web and the computer to support collaboration between people in distant locations. Collective intelligence increases as it creatively and constructively includes diverse viewpoints, information coming from different perspectives and differences of opinions. Collaboration with others can in fact raise the group's intelligence. Mass collaboration is one of Webs 2.0 distinguishing feature.

Students are completely immersed in the world of Web 2.0.

Our students go home and participate in the Web 2.0 world, and are for the most part, unsupervised and uncensored. Students find Web 1.0 completely irrelevant to their lives. In a Web 1.0 school, students are not able to use a computer that stimulates their curiosity. Most teachers are still living and working in a Web 1.0 environment. Most students have far greater technological ability and skill. Educators have a great deal of work to do just to catch up. Some teachers find this highly threatening. Others find that they have no time or interest in learning new technology. Much of our conversations here in this school focus on all the reasons why we can't make a change to Web 2.0. Computers are vastly underutilized in schools today. Computer technology is very expensive and this is not using public tax dollars effectively. Web 1.0 curriculum will not prepare students to enter the 21st century.


Education is stuck in a system of CONTROL. TEACHERS FEAR WHAT THEY DONT UNDERSTAND. It's paranoia running wild. Teachers fear that Web 2.0 may put student's safety at risk which is unfounded. Teachers fear students will locate websites that are inappropriate. They complain the students plagiarize assignments, use spell check, e-mail friends at inappropriate occasions; they search for inappropriate things on the Web. All of which happens in school, as well as home, but with supervision it can be reduced and controlled. Today our network is filtered at maximum levels so half of the Internet is not even accessible. I can't even read my own blog at school.


While on-line computer exploration opens a world of possibilities for our students, expanding their horizons and exposing them to different cultures and different ways of life, they can be exposed to dangers as they travel on the information highway. Students must be taught in school how to avoid dangerous and risky situations. Certainly netiquette and personal safety must be taught and re-taught. If the school fails to teach them netiquette, how will they ever learn this? Teachers need to monitor and supervise what the students are doing. Students can work safely in Web 2.0.


What do our students need to know to have a competitive edge using computer technology?


Our students must become self directed learners. Job skills change rapidly in the workplace. People will change occupations frequently as the world changes at very rapid speeds. Students must be able to teach themselves new skills. Technology doesn't stand still. Students need to become more self directed and to take charge of their own learning. Today students sit and wait for the teachers to tell them what to do. Teachers define the method, assess the outcome and control the entire learning/teaching process. Students do not take the initiative to educate themselves. We don't emphasize this aspect of education today. No wonder students sit and wait for someone to teach them, instead of taking the initiative themselves. We are all products of our educational system. Web 2.0 encourages people to become self directed learners.


Our students must become self-organizers. They must learn to manage a slew of information coming at them by developing their own systems and strategies for organizing and comprehending it all. Students need to develop blogs, wikis, electronic portfolios, and aggregate readers. Self organization skills must be taught in school. This skill is completely embedded in Web 2.0.

Our students must become self-editors. They must learn to look at a piece of information and access it on a variety of levels, not simply believe it because someone else does. Students need to be able to evaluate the validity and reliability of information. The question becomes; is the new information correct and accurate, and how does it change your thinking and opinion? This is a Web 2.0 process.

Our students must become self-selectors. They must learn to evaluate and finally select their own mentors, teachers, and collaborative learning communities as they build their own social networks. Students must select a number of collaborative learning communities for which they are actively engaged.

Our students must become self publishers. They must learn to understand the power and importance of sharing and connecting information and knowledge and can publish it quickly and efficiently. Students that can develop a global voice will have tremendous power and an advantage. This is what Web 2.0 is all about.

All of these skills and characteristics listed above are all part of a Web 2.0 curriculum. I believe that the “skill set” (listed above) will be critical to our students future.

Our student body completely agrees with me. It's time to rethink our technology curriculum. The students are excited about the possibilities of a new direction. Mr. McHugo and Mrs. Countryman do an excellent job teaching our Web 1.0 curriculum. We now must develop a new progressive technology curriculum we can all be proud of. We want our students to graduate from this school with a major technological advantage.

What must we do?

We can't jump into a Web 2.0 curriculum over night. It takes time to develop this curriculum correctly. This is “a process” which must be encouraged from the school board and administration. Pressure must be applied from the top down. Web 2.0 staff training needs to take place. Our staff is not up to speed with technology at this time. We need to move this discussion forward. We have no choice. We must change or fall hopelessly behind the rest of the world.

Sunday, May 20, 2007

Homework intervention group.

Some of our students are really struggling this time of the year. They are "educationally disengaged” in and out of school. They don’t turn in assignments. They don’t complete anything. Some are just a physical presence. The kids are just going through the motions until summer.

I suggest that we establish a learning community based on homework intervention next fall. We must work with teachers, parents, administration, teachers and students. Is there anyone out there doing any work in this area? I would love to hear from you

Sunday, May 6, 2007

An example of collective intelligence at work

As a staff, we developed this mission statement and vision statement. This was a collective effort.

Mission Statement
The mission of the _____ School District, in partnership with families and our community, is to uphold a safe and positive environment that fosters educational opportunities for the youth of our community to become contributing citizens and life long learners.

Our Vision
Members of the _____ School District, as a group of caring and professional individuals:

• Are respectful, courteous and responsible.
• Use all resources to improve learning.
• Value and enjoy learning with high expectations and standards.
• Recognize achievements.

What do employers look for in our students?

What do Employers look for in employees?
After reviewing a large number of papers on this subject. I have came to the conclusion that educators must carefully consider teaching and developing the following;
PASSION & Positive Attitude
Strong Work Ethic
Intrinsic Motivation
Focus
Persistence
Self Confidence
Empathy for Other People
People Skills & Teamwork Ability
Ability to Teach Yourself New Skills
Adaptability/Flexibility
Problem Solving & Analytical Skills
Ability to search & find answers
Oral/Written Communication skills
Reading, Writing & Math Skills
Computer Skills
Creativity

Our state test (the WASL) doesn't consider many of these areas. Perhaps we are leaving some children behind?